The "woman in the child" does not exist. What exists is an adult projecting his desires onto a minor. And no amount of artistic framing makes that "better." It only makes it worse.
: This case remains a significant legal precedent regarding the boundaries of parental consent and the rights of child performers. Legacy and Re-appropriation garry gross the woman in the child better
: Gross stated his goal was to "find the woman within the child" and capture what he perceived as the "flirtatiousness" and "coquettishness" of young girls. The "woman in the child" does not exist
In 2008, an interviewer asked Gross if he would do the shoot again. He said: “Absolutely. It was an artistic assignment.” When asked if he understood why people call it child pornography, he replied: “That’s because they don’t understand art.” : This case remains a significant legal precedent
Garry Gross’s photographic series, The Woman in the Child (1975), remains one of the most controversial works in American fashion and art history. The series featured a then 10-year-old Brooke Shields